Gore Galore: Adam Chaplin (2010)

Italian Post-Apocalypse Insanity!

Heinous for the Holidays: Home Sweet Home (1981)

A Killer Thanksgiving Workout!

Halloween Havoc: The Resurrected (1991)

The Best Adapatation of H.P. Lovecraft!

Fangs for Nothing: Rigor Mortis (2013)

The Last Great HK Horror Movie!

This Bud's for You: We are Angels: Two Face Jail (1997)

Bud Spencer and Philip Michael Thomas as... Monks!

Friday, October 10, 2025

Halloween Havoc: Tim Ritter's TRUTH OR DARE Series (1986-2017) Part 2

DEADLY DARES (2011): In the fourth installment, just like Tim Ritter himself, the story moves from Sunnyvale, FL to Lexington, KY. Here the schlubbiest of schlubs is named "Tuner" (Casey Miracle). After he loses his loser job and loses his loser girlfriend, Rose (Heather Price) - who he refers to as "doc" for no apparent reason. She dumps him because he refused a dare to run around around in the street naked on video in the middle of the night. If we know anything from watching three other TRUTH OR DARE movies, we know that you cannot decline a dare. You just can't.

This onslaught of losering causes him to... wait for it... get addicted to an internet site called DareTube.com! Didn't see that coming did you? I can't believe Ritter didn't register that URL to promote his movies. Apparently, Tim discovered the internet in 2010 and is all in with characters dialoguing grandfatherish explanations of how these things work and liberal use of the word "cyberworld". Would you believe he actually has a semi-updated MySpace page? Truth! Or was it a dare? Hard to say.

The DareTube website allows "players" to connect to other people who "love to play" Truth or Dare. This is supposed to be a country-wide internet phenomenon. I'm tempted to make a "sure Jan" snarky remark, but this was five years before TikTok, the ultimate "dare" video app. A video upload site where idiots be damn near killing themselves and others by doing dangerous shit that defies rational explanation. Why would you think eating Tide Pods would be a not bad thing? Anyway, Tuner connects to a loser hottie named Dara (Jessica Cameron) and with the relentless "encouragement" of his loser friend Axel (Billy W. Blackwell), Tuner and Dara take turns escalating their dares. Tuner dares her to do things like, show him a hidden tattoo... that turns out to be on her side. Phew, it's getting hot up in here! C'mon baby, let's see some ankle! This escalates with Dara doing more teasing and Tuner painting his face red with what looks like a black handlebar mustache, but is actually supposed to look like the original copper mask from part 1. With this make-up and a hoody, he runs around with Axel holding the camera, doing things like beating a homeless guy to death with a baseball bat.

It feels like at least half of the running time is intentionally badly shot home video clips of random people self mutilating, committing suicide, or murdering other people while mugging for the camera. These are supposed to be dares that have been uploaded to the website and while occasionally gory, wear out their welcome very quickly, particularly since the jiggly home camera shots are more nausea inducing than the killings. This finally culminates with the ultimate dare: Break Mike out of the sanitarium, which is... now in Kentucky? I guess if you are being goaded into murdering people and uploading videos of said crimes to the internet, fact-checking may not be in your repertoire. (SPOILER) In spite of the institution appearing to be abandoned, Tuner finds a skinny Mike in a room tied to a gurney and sets him free, only to find out that the entire movie has been a set-up by Rose, who is dressed up in Mike's black outfit (he must have raided The Shape's closet) and mask! She reveals that it was all orchestrated by her and Axel to get Tuner to prove that he loves her, and he failed that by getting infatuated with Dara! As punishment Tuner gets a knife in the guts. Ritter decides to actually put some real effort into this double twist and we find out that really, the whole thing was all in Tuner's imagination as an incredibly elaborate way to commit suicide. (/SPOILER)

This would have made a pretty decent short film, in spite of the cringe-inducing c.1998 obsession with the internet, and that may have been how it started, given how much Tim enjoys doing shorts and how much padding is responsible for stretching this thing out to 95 minutes. It makes sense, because if the home video sequences weren't bad enough, Ritter decides to re-make scenes from part 1 with a new cast for use as flashback material, and nothing says "filler" like flashbacks. These scenes are quickly and cheaply made in household rooms with bedsheets covering the walls, and with an even lower-quality video camera. this makes the rest of the very low-rent production look significantly better. That's literally the nicest thing I can say about them. I'm sure the next one will be better... right?


I DARED YOU! TRUTH OR DARE 5 (2017)
: Oh good lord, Tim! WTF? First let me say that I love the way Tim Ritter actually works out sequels that follow plot points from earlier films. Many people, both pro and indy, like to make sequels that are more or less stand-alone experiences, so that you don't have to see the previous movies to understand what is going on in the sequel. While Ritter uses flashbacks so that newbies aren't completely lost, there are so many things carried over from earlier movies that it's pretty much mandatory to have seen what came before or you will miss out on the best things that the series offer. Unfortunately, that also means that in 2017 we got a sequel to 2011's DEADLY DARES. Even more unfortunately, Ritter made this film with a guy named Scott Tepperman. Fucking Scott Tepperman. A micro-budget SOV "actor" who has also directed some extremely cheap VOD fodder that is the kind of movie where the cast and crew go on to movie sites, like IMDb, to anonymously post glowing reviews to bump up the score. His big claim to fame is being in SyFy's GHOST HUNTERS INTERNATIONAL. Oddly, he is not credited in it in the IMDb, though Wikipedia lists him as being one of the investigators from the final years of the show's run. I've never seen the show, but I've seen an episode of the original where a cheap nightvision video camera records a couple of dufuses in the dark saying things like "this is creepy" and "oh [bleep] did you hear that!?" and run around like idiots. Tepperman teamed up with a stuntman Jim O'Rear to make no-budget horror movies under the name Los Bastardz Productions and managed to get Tim Ritter to help them make some money at the expense of the audience.

Did I say Tuner from part 4 was "the schlubbiest of schlubs"? Holy shit, I was so wrong. Meet Dax Hakman (Tepperman). Dax is introduced to the audience being released from a clearly abandoned, graffiti-covered, mental facility that bears a stone plaque on the front that reads: "Building Committee." His doctor, Dr. Hall (Jim O'Rear), is releasing him due to... anybody, anybody? Yes, you in the back, that's right: Budget cuts... and hands him his business card with the website www.mikeystruthordare.com written on the back. Yeah, I don't know what happened to daretube.com either. Squatters maybe? Apparently before Dax was institutionalized, he was also the baseball kid who gets his face chainsawed in part 1. Because of this, he wears a copper half mask to hide what must be hideous scars. And because it would cost money for the make-up appliance to show his messed up mug, at no point in the movie is the mask ever removed, so we never find out. This is going to be a long 88 minutes, isn't it?

Freshly released, Dax strangles a prostitute (M. Catherine Wynkoop, Joel's wife) in a hotel room, as we learn in a flashback that he was institutionalized for strangling a young girl who wanted to play truth or dare. We also learn that Dax got in trouble for obsessing over horror movies and scream queen magazines. Yep, watching horror movies makes you a murderer... the conservative horror trope that will never just fuck off and die. In the flashback of him as a nine year old, he tells the girl that he dares her to let him strangle her. She screams "that's crazy!" at which point Dax strangles her, which pretty much proves her point. Unfortunately for Dax, his prostitute doesn't die as easily, so Dax uses a chainsaw on her in the bathtub while she's still alive. Sounds wild, right? Yeah, don't get excited, that shit costs money, so all we see is Dax's back and the sounds of a chainsaw and a blood spattered wall. At one point he turns his head sideways, so that the camera can see him eating something with overacted gusto and kissing a severed head - I wouldn't be surprised if the head was a prop left over from a previous movie, because that's one of the few make up effects in this movie.

We then see an unidentified person in a suit and tie ranting that the Truth or Dare website got his daughter killed (cue footage from DEADLY DARES). This person then gives old Dr. Hess (Joel Wynkoop) a suitcase full of cash to "make it stop". I'm not sure what that means, or whether Hess even would still have a license to practice any sort of medicine at this point, but he's just crazy enough to do it! Whatever it actually is. This segues into "Chainsaw" Dax doing the ol' Daretube - sorry Mikeystruthordare thing with "Stillborn" Sara (Trish Erickson-Martin) - both of whom appeared in a DEADLY DARES Daretube video. Dax does stuff like going into someone's bedroom while they are having cowgirl sex, going through their drawers with a flashlight on his head and the couple never even noticing that there is a 400 pound mouth breather in a half mask and a frickin' head lamp standing inches away from them! C'mon man, wtf? Maybe if they were doing it missionary? I don't know. Better still when our badass serial killer is finally noticed, he is terrified and waddles as fast as he can out of the house. He uploads a video of this for Sara who thinks it's great and in return, Sara tells Dax about how she was raped as a virgin by her boyfriend, who threw her unconscious, naked body in a bathtub and drew on her with a marker and took pictures. "I'll PM some of them to you." This tugs at Dax's heartstrings (no, really) and he decides to help her out, even though the pictures clearly show that she is wearing a big ass t-shirt that was written on. As Cheech Marin once said, "hey, that's false advertising, man!" Though, to be fair, I'm totally fine with that.

Meanwhile, Dr. Hess is barging in on Mikeystruthordare... uhh, influencers(?). One guy (Michael Baker) says that he is Crazy Joel, to which Hess, with a gun to the guy's head, yells "You're not Crazy Joel! I know Crazy Joel!" This is pretty damn funny by itself, but it's odd since Crazy Joel is another video uploader from DEADLY DARES, a movie that Dr. Hess isn't even in. Also meanwhile, Dax goes to visit his girlfriend (didn't he just get released from years in an asylum?) and... What happens? Anyone? Anyone? Yes, of course ...he finds her with another man! I know you all are shocked right now. Hilariously, he brought her plastic flowers at which the alleged girlfriend sneers at and says that they are fake "like you." To which Dax replies "At least they won't die, like you and loverboy here!" Loverboy says "Huh?" and Dax is forced to give back his key and run out of the house with his tail between his legs. Seriously, are we supposed to take this fucking guy seriously? He's "Chainsaw Dax," a serial killer, and yet he is constantly the biggest fucking pussy ever.

Even funnier, Dax is hanging out in his now ex-girlfriend's back yard, sipping a bottled water out of the side of his mouth, while she and her new guy giggle and pretend to be doing pinup photos and not noticing the 400 pound loser in a hoodie and half mask standing there watching them! Even funnier than that, Dr. Hall idly meanders up next to Dax and tells him that he's "just checking in" on him (how did he know he was there?). Dax then tells him everything is fine and that he met his soulmate on "that website", at which point Hall tells him that Hess is back in the headlines and then leaves his psychopathic patient to murder his ex. Seems like a responsible thing for a psychologist of homicidal patients to do. Dax, in spite of no longer having a key, goes back in the house and strangles his ex in the bathtub with some VHS tape, which we all know is incredibly durable. He also kills her new dude by stabbing him with a CD. I mean, I guess. Hey man, it's not physical media's fault that people died, the problem is mental illness... thoughts and prayers, thoughts and prayers.

While Hess has arguments with a plastic-surgery addict, Linda (Ashley Lynn Caputo), who is half his age, supposed to be his wife and can barely move her mouth when she talks, Dax and Sara take care of Sara's ex-boyfriend Josh (Todd Martin) with a string of Christmas lights (don't ask, I don't know), a baseball bat and suddenly we get to the meat of the plot. No really, Tim is all in on the heavy plot twists and turns this time and it breaks my heart that this script was ruined by Tepperman's involvement on nearly every level. With even a low budget, allegedly $5k (the crowdfund only brought in $3,376), this could have been highly entertaining. *deep breath* Ready? Spoilers are marked for those of you who still care.

(SPOILERS) Sara is actually also a patient of Dr. Hall and was directed by Hall to get Dax to kill Dr. Hess. Dr. Hess was hired by a guy working for Dr. Hall, so that he would get himself back in the headlines and be easy for Dax to find. Dax is so mad at being manipulated by Hall that he throws a pad of paper and a pen on the floor of his office and accuses him of the set-up. The doc admits it, but says he did it because he was dumped by Linda who went and married Dr. Hess! This, once again, tugs at Dax's dumbass heart-strings and he decides to help Hall by shooting a video of a naked Linda and a clothed (thank god) Hess having sex literally inches away without them noticing - again! How is this big goombah also a ninja?

(SPOILERS) Dax then kidnaps Linda and Hess calls up Axel (from part 4, who was supposed to be a figment of Tuner's imagination!). Hess needs Axel's help... in padding out the movie. Axel talks a lot, says nothing. Hess is then dared by Dax to inject himself with heroin, while he shows Hess a video of Linda having gas poured on her. Hess has to pick up a massive needle from two campy gay dudes who are supposed to be gang members (I think this is supposed to be comic relief). He is then directed to inject himself and stumbles around like he's an extremely articulate drunk, proving nobody involved with any aspect of this production has any idea what heroin is or does. Hess then must go to a bar and cut off his finger (the only real gore effect in the movie). Meanwhile we get lots of "news" clips of random people decrying this crazy ass, middle aged, out of shape doctor going around committing crimes in broad daylight, uploading them to the web and leaving the police utterly baffled as to how to catch him.

(SPOILERS) This all culminates in a showdown between two overweight, out of shape dudes running from each other in the now officially abandoned asylum (that still looks exactly the same as before). But before they clash, we discover that... hoo boy... Dr. Hall is a crossdresser with an axe who wants to kill Dr. Hess, take all of the money that Dr. Hess got paid and take Dax with him to Switzerland where he can get a sex change and be the woman he always wanted to be with Dax by his side... So yeah, there's that. We then get Dax running around with a non-working chainsaw shouting "I dare you... to die!" Of course, both Dax and Dr. Hess live to take on another sequel. Yay? (/SPOILERS)


Starting out life as an Indy a Go Go crowdfunder, headed up by Tepperman, the campaign promised a sequel to the original TRUTH OR DARE with Asbestos Felt, "many skilled, veteran special effects artists" and walk-on roles for every person who ponies up $20 or more. Asbestos Felt wasn't in it, there were really only two special effects scenes and with 64 total backers, I don't think they squeezed even half of those people in the movie, but it sure explains the incredibly low bar for acting this time out. Granted, DEADLY DARES appeared to be a lot of Tim's random friends and fans instead of the trained aspiring actors that previous movies had, but this time out it's actually worse. Fortunately, we have Wynkoop's enthusiastic performance keeping this from being a total loss. The campaign also warned that Tepperman would really just be riding Ritter's cult status for his own ambitions by admitting that he is co-everything. Director, producer, editor, art department, etc. Everything except writer, thankfully. At least Ritter could write his sequel and we'd have that going for it. In the end, the campaign ended with $3,376 pledged out of a goal of $8,500. I don't know if Tim Ritter heading up the campaign and not partnering with a notorious hackster would have got more backers, but it couldn't have hurt.

Damn, how the mighty have fallen. I guess Tim Ritter is getting old (he was 50 when this was made) and not really feeling up to doing all that hard work that indy films require and seemingly more interested on his writing career. Even so, maybe at least be a bit selective about who you are going to partner up with (I'm having flashbacks to Don Dohler and Joe Ripple). Everyone has their flaws, but Tepperman has all the flaws. Apparently, Tepperman phoned and emailed Ritter until he agreed and, let's be honest, a movie based on the best script ever is only going to be as good as the people putting it on the screen. This is not the way the fabled franchise should end, but it seems like that may well be the final nail. As sad as that is, we still have the excellent first film and it's proper sequel SCREAMING FOR SANITY (1998). Plus, we also have the sorta-remake KILLING SPREE (1987) in which the lead is not totally a schlub! Tepperman can't take those away, not even with a prop chainsaw.

Friday, October 3, 2025

Halloween Havoc: Tim Ritter's TRUTH OR DARE Series (1986-2017) Part 1

One of the common attitudes toward filmmakers in Hollywood over the years is "what have you done for me lately?" Sure, there are filmmakers who make such a big blockbuster that they get handed blank check after blank check no matter how many bombs fall afterwards (see: "Wachowski"), but due to the vibes and politics nature of who's in and who's out, aspiring filmfolk can find themselves quickly sinking beneath the waves of indifference. But what of the amateur/underground videomakers? More specifically, what about those cult (in the stricter sense of the term) movie makers who get written up in zines and websites that are getting rarer and rarer as the years tick by. It's the "gore-tuers" who I'm interested in this Halloween.

The '80s were notorious for harsh cinematic censorship, even in countries like the US, where censorship is unconstitutional and our film rating / censor board, the MPAA, had to do some sweaty gymnastics to dance around that fact. Because of the inevitable march of movies going direct to video, low-budget movie makers suddenly didn't need to worry about appealing to cinema owners or being advertised in newspapers. Cinemas and papers had strict rules about what could be shown and advertised in this pre-internet age, and now these movies could just flip the bird at the ratings board and do whatever they wanted to. Since graphic violence in independent horror movies was something the MPAA loved to come down with all of their self-righteous fury, young video makers wanted to do violent shit. Such as the infamous VIOLENT SHIT (1989), from Germany's own Andreas Schnaas.

BLOOD CULT (1985) was the first shot on video horror movie sold directly to video stores during that boom time in which mom & pop shops were ravenous for product. Horror was big business in the '80s and on video it was a killing field. BLOOD CULT was hugely successful and even spawned a less successful sequel, REVENGE (1986). It also made a lot of people realize they could do that too. One of those people was Florida man Tim Ritter, who had already made a Super 8 movie DAY OF THE REAPER (1984), that he self distributed on VHS (some of you remember the days of the back page ads for self-published VHS horrors in Fangoria). He followed this up with a Super 8 anthology, co-directed with frequent collaborator Joel Wynkoop, TWISTED ILLUSIONS (1985). This was also self-distributed, so I feel like BLOOD CULT still retains the crown for micro-budget indy horror breaking that plastic ceiling. Particularly since it was so broadly released that every single video store (except for Blockbuster, which wasn't a real threat until about 1989) had a copy on their shelves. They wouldn't hang on to that crown long.

Ritter's biggest success came with a shot on 16mm, massively distributed on VHS, movie called TRUTH OR DARE? (1986). If you rented horror movies from your local video stores back then, you know exactly what the box looks like, you probably rented it and very probably told all of your friends about it, and they told their friends. It was kind of a big deal in certain circles at the time. With those two Super 8 films under his belt, a then 18 year old Tim Ritter, wrote and directed the story of an average shlub, Mike Strauber, who snaps and embarks on a murder spree after he finds his girlfriend cheating on him. If you have seen any of Tim Ritter's outings, this may sound very familiar, as this is literally the set-up for a many of his movies. They say "write what you know" and yeah, some girl traumatized the shit out of this guy.

Following TRUTH OR DARE?, Ritter made an excellent quasi-remake titled KILLING SPREE (1989), shot on 16mm and starring the greatest name in horror, the late Asbestos Felt. Ritter then made a variety of sequels (see below) and a few other odd projects, including an unexpected turn with a Christian SOV horror movie titled RECONCILLED THROUGH THE CHRIST (2005). And finally his last proper movie I DARED YOU! TRUTH OR DARE 5 (2017). When I say "proper", I mean that I'm excluding movies where he just directed segments in anthologies or a movie with four other credited writers. (As you may have guessed, this is really just an excuse to get me out of talking about 2021's SHARKS OF THE CORN).

To Ritter's credit, the TRUTH OR DARE series has never done the obvious thing of simply rehashing what worked in the first movie ad nauseum. Well, except for the whole "cheating women driving dudes crazy" thing. Anything you'd like to share with the group, Tim?

So what has Tim Ritter done for us lately? Before we dive into 5, let's recap the series for those folks who aren't David Zuzelo.

TRUTH OR DARE? A CRITICAL MADNESS (1986): In this first entry, we are introduced to a schlub named Mike Struber (John Brace), a suit and tie guy in a copper '70 Firebird Trans Am. Yeah, it's not the finest car ever built, but damn it sure looks cool. Mike comes home to his hot wife Sharon (Mary Fanaro) banging his buddy Jerry (Bruce Gold). After being told that their marriage is toast, which seems obvious, Mike tears away in his bitchin' TA to go have flashbacks on all of the red flags that have gone up recently. And also some memories of self-mutilation as a child, for some reason. 

While driving aimlessly, Mike picks up a very friendly hitchhiker with big... hair and takes his hot date to a campsite. Jesus dude, really? I'm beginning to understand why Mike got dumped. As they sit on logs, the hitchhiker suggests that they play Truth or Dare. Things start simply enough and quickly spiral out of control with Mike being dared to slash his chest with a knife, cut off a finger and rip his tongue out. Mike, the schlub that he is, figures he can dare her to lift up her blouse, to which she merely untucks her top, without exposing a centimeter of flesh. Seems fair.

Finally, Mike is found alone, by the park ranger, covered in blood and screaming "Truth or dare! Truth or dare!" Thirteen months later in the Sunnyvale Mental Institution, Mike's doctors talk about how well he has healed (apparently he had his finger and tongue reattached...?) and how budget cuts make him a great candidate to release back into the wild! Just an FYI for those unaware, this is a commentary on the popular and pervasive GOP desire to cut state spending on mental health services in the '80s, resulting in mass closures of mental institutions and the dumping of their patients out on to the streets to become the homeless people that the same politicians and voters then complained about. But I digress.

Of course, the first thing Mike does after getting his walking papers is stalk his wife. This leads to a great little HALLOWEEN-inspired sequence in which Mike is in her house with a large carving knife, trying to kill her and Jerry without being seen. He kills Jerry, but is surprised by Sharon who slices open his stomach in spite of her terrible culinary knife skills. This leads to Mike being patched up and thrown back into the looney bin. Mike plays Truth or Dare with some imaginary inmates (one being the late, great Asbestos Felt) before carving up half of his face, creating a copper mask in the asylum's metal shop (is that really a thing that asylums had?) before managing to escape past an angry, racist guard (Joel Wynkoop, Tim's buddy and the original choice for the lead). Once Mike busts out, he goes on a wild killing spree while the bumbling local detectives try to chase him down without destroying the town. They are mostly successful.

At one point Mike steals a '79 Bonneville land yacht and runs down a baby in a stroller and its mother (the shot of the mother being run over was deleted from the finished film). He also gets into a chase with some punks and blows up their car, shoots a group of people waiting for a bus with an M16, smacks an old lady with a morning star, because she berates him for running into her trash cans (a direct reference to 1984's REPO MAN), chainsaws the face of a little leaguer (where did he get all this stuff?) all on his way to get to his wife's house so he can finally kill her for dumping him. Seems a bit excessive, but everybody has their own ways of coping. Unlike the other entries, I can't in good conscience post spoilers because if you haven't seen it, you should. There are lots of great little moments written into the script that you would never see in your average low-budget DTV horror movie, particularly these days. Additionally, some of the actors are surprisingly good and Brace does a nice job straddling the line between serious and campy as Mike.

The film was written by a 17 year old Ritter, who had made two self-distributed Super 8 movies prior. The second was TWISTED ILLUSIONS (1985), an anthology co-directed with Joel Wynkoop. One of the stories was the original short, titled A CRITICAL MADNESS, that would go on to be expanded into TRUTH OR DARE? Ritter, driven to get this film produced for any amount of money, managed to hype the project in the local press and even Variety. Eventually he secured funding of $350,000 ($1.1 million in 2025 dollars) through a local video distributor looking for new product to sell direct to video stores across the nation. Ritter had been planning on shooting on a budget of $60,000 ($6,000 if things didn't go well), so this was a huge amount of money that allowed Ritter to shoot on 16mm with a full crew, including veteran special effects master Bob Shelly. Shelly had worked on classics like CANNIBAL APOCALYPSE (1980) and GHOSTBUSTERS (1984) before signing on with Tim. This allowed Ritter to do things like a car explosion with a no-suit burn gag, adding significant production value to his little movie.

Like so many stories we hear about indy filmmaking, not everything went well. The make-up effects team that were brought in for the copious gore effects were not able to do all of the things that they promised at the outset. Shelly offered to take over some of the work and, according to Tim, completely saved the production, in spite of having to scale back some of the more ambitions effects. The troubles didn't stop there as the producer (Yale Wilson) who was hired by the backer was constantly at odds with the gory horror aspects of the script. One of the things he fought against was the scene in which Mike runs down a mother and child. Originally the scene was supposed to show Mike targeting them and deliberately running them down in his stolen car. Wilson took issue with this and forced Ritter to change it to look like hitting the baby carriage was an accident and running over the mother was a crime of opportunity. After more conflicts over 12 days of a 14 day shoot, Ritter was banned from the set and locked out of the editing room. This resulted in the film being toned down with the shot of the mother being run over omitted completely. Wilson even went so far as to strip Ritter's name from the credits, replacing it with his own name. Forced to take legal action, Ritter received a judgment in his favor, but not before the film master was completed and the retail tapes had already been manufactured with Wilson's name on them. Even with all of the issues, this is a pretty amazing accomplishment for an untrained, 18 year old kid. It also explains why he has spent most of his decades-long career shooting on video with non-professionals.

WICKED GAMES (1994): In this second entry, a schlub named Gary (Kevin Scott Crawford) discovers his wife cheating on him. His cop friend (Joel Wynkoop) helpfully tells him that he might take after his cousin, the mass murderer Mike Strauber, who is still locked up in the Sunnyvale sanitarium. Uhhh, thanks? Folks start getting killed by a man in a new copper mask (not Mike's old one) until (SPOILER) we find out that it's not one, but three killers using Mike's MO. In a patented Tim Ritter double twist, we discover that it's all just crazy Mike's fantasy, with him imagining his doctors (including Wynkoop) having followed in his footsteps, randomly killing folks. (/SPOILER) Sadly, it feels like it was just done as a fun weekend project with minimal script and production values, even by micro-budget SOV standards. The best bit, aside from the fun double twist, is a scene in which a victim is stabbed with a machete and then falls on top of a lawn sprinkler which goes right through the cut and starts spraying blood. Sometimes you have to just take what you can get.

SCREAMING FOR SANITY (1998): In the third in the series, Ritter gets much more ambitious than part 2, and makes the main character a schlub named Clive (Ken Blanck), the husband of the woman and father of the child that Mike runs over with his car in part 1. Honestly, I think this is a brilliant premise for a sequel that would directly follow TRUTH OR DARE? The rather offhand murder of Clive's wife and child didn't mean much to Mike, but it had a massive impact on the mental health of husband and father, Clive, just as you expect it would. That fateful event caused him to lose his shit and be confined to the very same Sunnyvale nuthouse that Mike currently resides in. Coincidentally, he is released on his own recognizance at the very same time that Mike's doctor, Dr. Hess (Joel Wynkoop) decides to beat up Mike because he bears some very deep resentment after Mike got past him when he was just an orderly in the first film. As a psychologist, you'd think Dr. Hess would recognize his festering guilt complex. Not only is Dr. Hess fired, but he gets excoriated in the press with all too close-to-the-bone accusations of being the weak link that allowed Mike to go on his killing spree.

Clive is tortured by hallucinations, bouts of self-mutilation and suddenly people start getting killed by a man in a copper mask. Unlike part 1, it just seems to be random idiots who are either profiting off of the true crime story of the Sunnyvale killer, or some loser goth chick who desperately wants to marry Mike Strauber, sending him repeated fan mail, in spite of the fact that he never bothered to write back to her. Additionally, the disgraced Dr. Hess seems to be a target too, and is being stalked by the killer. At one point, Hess' semi-estranged, much-too-young to be into pudgy, balding middle age dudes, wife is kidnapped and nailed to a wall in a warehouse restroom. Damn, that's just cruelly unhygienic. In a nice twist (SPOILER) Dr. Hess kills Clive, who actually is the killer, and he was driven to murder by his own doctor and his sister in the hopes that Clive would kill Dr. Hess, for "letting" Mike escape the asylum! The double twist is limited here to simply having Clive's sister being haunted by Clive's ghost holding the copper mask. (/SPOILER)

While part 2 was rather lackluster, except for the ending, this outing had a lot more effort put into it. Though, I should mention that in spite of the warning at the beginning of the movie that what you are about to see contains graphic sex and violence (man, if that doesn't take you back to the '90s!), there is no nudity and not much blood. In spite of this, I enjoyed it quite a bit. The plot is surprisingly complex, mercifully free of padding and sports better than average acting for a '90s SOV outing. While watching it, I kept thinking "this is the real sequel to TRUTH OR DARE!" As it turns out, in fact it was the original concept that Ritter had for a sequel that he pitched to the producers of part 1. Apparently, they passed on it, possibly due to the contentious power struggles and litigation during part 1. Even so, I find this somewhat amazing considering how ubiquitous the original was on VHS. I'm pretty sure some folks put their kids through college on that movie and usually sacks of cash will bandage all wounds in any business.

Next Up: Tim Ritter's TRUTH OR DARE Series (1986-2017) Part 2

Thursday, July 24, 2025

Abyss-Mal Cinema: MONSTER SHARK (1984)

Growing up in the shadow of greatness must be a complicated thing. On the one hand, they get to be a neppo baby and work in the notoriously difficult to enter Hollywood film industry in their youth, get their first film made and distributed in their 20s and deny any nepotism to the press, saying things like "I worked hard to get where I am and it wasn't easy." On the other hand, having to constantly be compared to the towering public image of your legendary parent has got to be a real pain in the ass. I'm not a fan of Nick Cage, but I do appreciate that he didn't use his famous family name of Coppola to get his foot in the door. Sure, you can argue that, like Emilo Estevez, not using the famous name is really only a minor handicap. Because of the insular nature of Hollywood, everybody knows who you are, even if some of them don't realize it until after you show up at the audition.

As an American who did not grow up with the internet, the paltry info that I could get on Italian genre filmmakers came from books and sometimes magazines, most of which took a pretty dim view of Italian genre cinema right out of the gate. It still feels a little bizarre to walk into my local art-house theater and see the ticket taker wearing a Dario Argento t-shirt or even just hear young people rave about horror movies that aren't American. Back in the day, cult movies were in fact, cult movies. Because of this, I had no idea of how Lamberto Bava fared in his father's immense shadow in Italy, but I suspect it wasn't easy. Probably even less easy because no matter how much I enjoy Lamberto's works for what they are, he really can't hold a candle to his pops, Mario. But then again, who can?

Fair warning: Thar be spoilers ahead.

Styled more like a giallo than a traditional horror movie, we have a lot of plot, a lot of characters and their story arcs are intercut around the threat of an aquatic killer. Opening with a Florida coast guard chopper discovering half of a boat and half of a man in the water, two scuba divers jump from the copter to rescue what's left of the sailor. They do this while screaming "aaaaaaaaaaaaahhh!" as I'm sure you are taught to do at the Coast Guard Academy. Meanwhile, Dr. Bob (Dino Conti) and his Budweiser can are patrolling the sea in the Seaquarium research vessel. Suddenly they are assaulted by some weird shit that crashes into the ship and sets off his sensors. Back at what appears to be an ocean park (according to Sopkiw, possibly University of Miami in Key Biscayne), Dr. Stella (Valentine Monnier) is feeding her Disney-named dolphins when they abruptly go berserk and start thrashing around in the water. When Flipper starts flippin' out you know shit is going down.

The coroner informs Sheriff Gordon (the great Gianni Garko) that the guy that the coast guard fished out of the ocean has bite marks far too big for a shark! This news seems to make the sheriff concerned. As if that wasn't bad enough, Dr. Bob discovers that his audio recordings of whatever it was that attacked the Seaquarium ship are now blank! This means one thing: "only Peter can help" says Dr. Bob. "Peter?" says Dr. Stella, echoing audience sentiment.

Peter (Michael Sopkiw), the local electronics expert, is all set to escape to New York for his vacation, which is weird because he just fought George Eastman there and I wouldn't think he'd want to go back. Fortunately for him Dr. Stella remembers and shows up begging him to stall his trip for one day to make a special kind of "converter" that would pick up the strange sounds that they believe to be at a frequency that their current equipment cannot record. Peter folds faster than a Silicon Valley startup and has to tear his assistant Sandra (Iris Peynado) away from a game of Activision's "Sea Quest" in order to get cracking on this new piece of tech. Damn, where was this girl when I was a teen? Oh yeah, making out with Michael Sopkiw...

Meanwhile, marine scientist Dr. Davis (Lawrence Morgant) is working in the lab, late one night... on the boss' wife Sonja (Dagmar Lassander). The pair are seen by lab assistant Florinda (Cinzia de Ponti) who happens to be walking past a window causing Sonja to panic. After a man with a particular style of watch calls Florinda and she tells him that he can't get away with "it" and that she is going to go to the press, she starts to pack up her clothes and calls a taxi to get out of town pronto! Apparently she realized that she was on dangerous ground, as a man named Miller (Paul Branco) breaks into Florinda's home at strangles her in seconds flat with his... fists? Is that an Italian thing? Being the crafty dude that Miller is, he sets her body in a bath with a hair dryer to make it appear to be an accident. Since this is an Italian production, it makes sense that the screenwriters would think that the cops would just ignore the bruising on the neck and obvious signs of suffocation and just chalk the whole thing up to an accident. Err, did I not say this was essentially a giallo?

Even later that night, after being seduced by Sandra, Peter finds Miller and another man in his workshop smashing the shit out of the new sensor that he had made. This upsets him, so the two interlopers decide to smash the shit out of Peter too. The plot thickens! I would make a crack about the plot thinning, but good lord, this has more stuff going on that is not about a homicidal sea beast than Peter Benchley's 1974 novel, "Jaws". This actually works for me far better than Benchley's hackneyed Mafia stereotypes. I get that THE GODFATHER (1972) was a big hit and that Mafia angle probably sold just as may copies as the shark thing, but at least a detective-mystery plot is timeless. Seriously, if you have never read Benchley's novel, you should do it, if for no other reason than to truly appreciate how well-crafted the JAWS (1975) screenplay turned out.

After an attack on two speargun fisherman, the doctors at the hospital are convinced that it was the work of the same shark-ish thing and take a cast of one of the wounds. The result is a giant plaster tooth that is definitely not of shark origin. The sheriff is alarmed by this, though his deputy is more interested in the new waitress with the "headlamps", which leads the sheriff to comment "lotsa new things in this town recently: waitresses, sharks and a gal who calls a taxi and then takes a bath..." Later in the film, the one surviving fisherman will finally give up the ghost at which point the doctor says "He's dead." The sheriff (who would in real life probably be the local coroner) notes the cause of death: "It was fear. Fear stopped his heart." Remind me never to be a victim and end up in a Florida hospital.

Peter, Dr. Bob and Dr. Stella roam the seas and have a brief encounter with our not-shark, while two unlucky seniors have their boat attacked by a tentacled beast with massive teeth. This calls for... another doctor! Yes, as if the cast wasn't packed like sardines as it is, enter Dr. Janet (Darla N. Warner, wife of one of the movie's money men) who proceeds to lecture the group on what exactly this creature, which hasn't been seen by any living person, might be. She starts off her lecture by telling them that 320 years ago fish developed teeth. Hoo boy, we are already off to a rough start as that would be the 1600s. She continues, saying that the Tylosaurus appeared at the beginning of the "Setaceous period, about 120 million years ago" or, if you are not Luigi Cozzi, during the late Cretaceous period, about 92 to 66 million years ago. But that's not important right now, because "the true ancestor of the shark, as we know it today, was the Pseudogalacias Volta, and it appeared at the end of the Setaceous era, 60 million years ago." Wait, what?! The Fake Electric Spaniard?? Ok, so never mind what a Pseudogalacias Volta is (other than my new band name), but 60 million years ago was the start of the Phanerozoic period. Because of this, I absolutely believe her when she says that she put this information into "the computer" and it said that this creature was a living fossil. So, Mitch McConnell? Unblinking stare, destroys people's lives and has no remorse? Yeah, that checks out.

At this point Dr. Bob and his Budwiser say that it has to be taken alive! I would say that the beer can is surgically grafted to Dr. Bob's hand, except every now and then, he angrily throws one into the water. Hey, you don't know, maybe he's trying to build an artificial reef. The sheriff, because he is a sheriff, is going to stop it "his own way!" which translates to "blow shit up!" This leads to a race between the factions to see who can catch it or kill it.

Of course, this being the movie that this is, we find out that Sandra gave Peter's shop keys to Miller in order to destroy the "converter"! It is implied that they had a relationship at some point (which is just weird) and she gave him the keys, possibly out of fear, although this subplot is instantly forgotten and appears to be included only as a way for Peter to hook up with the white girl, Dr. Stella, and not come off like a womanizing sleaze. While this is going on, Professor West (William Berger) shows up and tries to get access to a computer file called Sea Killer. I mean, if you are going to set up a black ops project about an ancient octopus shark hybrid that I think was engineered in a lab for a profit-hungry corporation, isn't that project name a bit on the nose? After many attempts and a single, tiny screw being turned inside of a machine, we find out that this beast is Dr. Davis' project and that the creature's cells live only eight months before they reproduce! If they wait too much longer or if the creature gets blowed up, as the sheriff says "we could find ourselves up to our asses in monsters!" 

We get more tentacle attacks, including one in which Dr. Janet manages to survive because of a handy hatchet. Just think of those poor Japanese schoolgirls. How many could have been saved had they only had easy access to some outdoor woodworking tools. Even so, things do not go well for Dr. Janet as fucking Miller shows up to kill everyone on the Seaquarium, leading to an underwater fight scene between Peter and Dr. Stella against Miller and one of his kneecappers. Sopkiw has said in interviews that it was one of his favorite things that he's done in a movie and is a genuinely great moment, showing Lamberto's level of commitment on a shoestring budget. Any modern low-rent shark-monster flick would have those pages torn out of the script on day one.

On our way to the climactic showdown with the beast, Professor West confronts Dr. Davis who tells him that he dunnit because "our future is in the sea" and that it was his plan to use his created monster to "protect an exploitable area". Nothing about how he plans to get at the exploitable stuff in that exploitable area when it's being guarded by a very angry homicidal monster, but one step at a time, I guess. The best part about this tying up of plot threads is that West literally explains the giallo twist in a line of dialogue saying: "giving her lover the identical watch she gave her husband for an anniversary present..." So it was Dr. Davis giving the orders to Miller the whole time! For a scientist, he really didn't think this whole thing through, did he? Fortunately the sheriff was just out of sight, hears the whole confession and is able to take down the mad scientist while striking an oddly Western gunslinger pose. Weird, eh? This all leads to a showdown with flamethrowers in the Everglades (or according to Spokiw, an Italian swamp) in literally 12 inches of water. Yes, flamethrowers and water. And a giant sea monster in a what is tantamount to a shallow stream. 

Initially set to produce the movie, brothers Sergio and Luciano Martino approached the Italian genre stalwart Luigi Cozzi to write a killer shark movie set in the waterways of Venice. Cozzi wrote the script, titled DEVOURING JAWS, that both Martino's approved of, but Sergio got involved in directing no less than four films in 1983, including the classic 2019: AFTER THE FALL OF NEW YORK. This put the shark project on hold until the decision was made to retool the script for a smaller budget and hand the production duties over to veteran Mino Loy, who produced such greats as HAVE A GOOD FUNERAL MY FRIEND, SARTANA WILL PAY (1970) and EATEN ALIVE! (1980), and French porn director Max Pécas who may be best known in the English speaking world as the director of the utterly batshit insane cop movie BRIGADE OF DEATH (1985). The directorial duties were then handed to Lamberto Bava. Since the budget was sparse, Bava decided to revamp the script once again into a sort of giallo of the sea. Apparently Gianfranco Clerici, Vincenzo Mannino, Herve Piccini and the Italian genre veteran  Dardano Sacchetti helped out in this respect, which probably explains how the plot became so convoluted, particularly for what was ostensibly a simple monster movie.

Originally titled SHARK: RED ON THE WATER, MONSTER SHARK was released on US VHS as DEVIL FISH, which to be honest, is a great title. Along with the fantastic art, which was not exclusive to the US, suckered me into renting the tape as a teenager. For reasons that will probably never be known, the US distributor Vidmark Entertainment retitled and heavily re-edited the film. In addition to inserting the shots of the small monster puppet travelling through the water so that they appear many more times during the film, they took the entire scene of the archetypical Florida senior couple being attacked by the creature that appears in the middle of the film and brought it up to be the opening scene. Additionally, they cut what minor gore that there was to begin with and removed all of the nudity as well as the minor profanity (I'm pretty sure about this, but since my VHS tape is long gone and I can't pay collector's prices for another one, I'm unable to double check). This seems a really bizarre choice to make. It is entirely possible that Vidmark bought a TV print on the cheap and slapped an R rating on the box to sucker kids like me into renting a neutered product. It was a fairly common practice in the early to mid '80s and was the bane of my hormone-infested existence. At the time, I was really disappointed by the movie, particularly since I had really high expectations for Italian genre films with the likes of DEMONS (1985) getting theatrical playdates in my area and with Lamberto Bava and Dario Argento's names blazing from the posters and ads. Argento's PHENOMENA (1985) had also been released in American theaters and on VHS about the same time, under the title CREEPERS, and even though it was even more heavily censored than DEVIL FISH, it was still a jaw-dropping movie that completely refused to ape American horror cinema of the time.

Years later I got to see an import version of what we now know as MONSTER SHARK and my opinion changed. Sure it's still not as good as it could have been, but I think it's a pretty damn entertaining film in sometimes the wrong ways, but also in the right ways. The monster itself is actually really impressive for a couple of reasons. For one, it's a full size puppet and in my humble opinion looks far better than the usual stock shark footage or simple shark head found in other similar films. Unfortunately we don't get to see much of it in the film as Lamberto wasn't as impressed and found it unmanageable, regulating it to glimpsed flashes of it's teeth, an eye, a tentacle, here and there. Secondly, the design of the head is actually based on some archeological research. While I made fun of Dr. Janet's history lesson, someone was paying attention in pre-history class because during the late Devonian period (382-358 million years ago), we got an aquatic nightmare that made a Great White look like a King Prawn: the Dunkleosteus. Among its sphincter-clenching specs, these fish had dermal bone armor and their jaws, instead of teeth, were all bone and acted as shears that could open twice as fast as the blink of a human eye, had the strongest bite force of any animal on earth and could easily slice through skulls and armor plating. If you look at the fossils and artist renderings of the Dunkleosteus and it's kin, you can easily see where the creators of the Monster Shark got their ideas. Additionally, I give it bonus points because in 2010, to my eternal shame, Roger Corman's New Horizons made a knock-off for the SyFy Channel titled SHARKTOPUS. Because it's the modern era where nobody takes shit seriously, we got a cheap CGI monster sporting the front half of a shark and the back half of an octopus. I know it was popular enough to spawn sequels, but c'mon after seeing that, I give huge props to the unsung heroes who put together a life-size Monster Shark puppet that actually drew upon the archeological record for inspiration instead of slapping some shit together on what looks like a Silicon Graphics Workstation. Rog could do better. We all know that.

I also feel the need to point out the amazing cast, although I strongly suspect that if you are visiting this website, you know exactly who these folks are. In addition to Michael Sopkiw in one of his mere four movies made under the same contract, you have Valentine Monnier, who appeared with Sopkiw in 2019: AFTER THE FALL OF NEW YORK; the legendary Gianni Garko, veteran of giallos, westerns, crime and even some peplums and comedies; William Berger, a veteran with an even more varied career in practically every genre you can name; and Dagmar Lassander, yet another Italian veteran with giallos, horror, soft-core, comedies, crime and so on. Even if the giallo plotting of the movie turns you off a bit, it's pretty damn cool to see all of these legends in one movie. We even get Iris Peynado, probably best remembered by genre fans as the striking beauty in WARRIORS OF THE WASTELAND (1983). 

Bava said in a 1987 interview that the use of the pseudonym was used for projects that he was hired to direct, not his own personal projects, which puts to rest the old saw that he was embarrassed of the films that bear his pseudonym. That seems to be a North American sentiment that may have originated from the old "Alan Smithee" nom de plume that the DGA allowed to be used on films that had ended up outside of the director's control and credit was unwanted. The general public took this to mean that it was an indicator of shame and an inferior product. And really, unless you are a hard-core contrarian, you have to admit that Lamberto manages to work in some great camera setups that modern low-budget movie makers would never even bother with. As it is, I find that in the old-man-shouting-at-cloud phase of my life, MONSTER SHARK is a fun little movie. I mean, you could do a hell of a lot worse. Have you seen Blumhouse's WOLF MAN (2025)?

Sunday, July 6, 2025

Giallo Pudding: MADNESS (1994) aka EYES WITHOUT A FACE

I know that anyone tuning into this website doesn't need a refresher course on Bruno Mattei. If you do, I will sum up by saying that he is a one of a kind Italian genre director who has made some wonderfully off-kilter, low-budget horror films that back in the '80s, '90s and even 2000s were frequently written off a junk and if you met another person who also liked Bruno Mattei movies, there is no stronger bond of friendship. These days with the internet providing all sorts of oddities that are amplified by social media and physical media companies releasing all sorts of things that used to be cult films in the strictest sense of the word, there are plenty of movie buffs who know Mattei's work. However, if you have only seen the films that have been released on blu-ray, you are missing some of his admittedly lesser, but none the less, entertaining movies.

Back before Dario Argento reinvented the Italian genre staple of the giallo with his "animal" trilogy that kicked off with THE BIRD WITH THE CRYSTAL PLUMMAGE (1970), the giallo film could be a little stodgy and perhaps even dry, to some. Argento took a genre that is somewhat analogous to the British and North American mystery genre and made it stylish and exciting. This offended some purists, but was hugely successful at home and in the international marketplace. Even after Argento met his muse in Daria Nicolodi, and merged the giallo with the proto-slasher film following the success of Mario Bava's gory trendsetter, A BAY OF BLOOD (1971), there were still some folks who liked the old fashioned, more grounded gialli, where there is a puzzle to solve, the pacing is deliberate and stylistic flourishes are kept to a minimum. Who knew that Bruno Mattei would be one of them? Or maybe he was just broke and couldn't afford all of the bells and whistles. Cue Bruno spinning in his grave.

Opening with a head-to-toe black clad killer with a zip up balaclava pursuing a child at a go-kart racetrack, we quickly find out that he is not after the kid, but in fact, the child's minder, an attractive young woman who is freaking out trying to find the damn kid. Unfortunately for her, this lands her straight into the clutches of our growling, and presumably thermoplegic, killer who whips out a dual-bladed stiletto and promptly gouges out one of her eyes. Not content with that, he also smashes a bottle and uses the broken glass to stuff her eye sockets. So, yeah, this chucklehead is probably not going to get much out of a telehealth visit.

Later, at a press conference, the publishing and creative staff of a popular fumetti titled "Doctor Dark", take some flack from the attendees. "Doctor Dark" is about a professor of Paganism who is moonlighting as a serial killer (presumably because teaching doesn't pay shit) who collects his victim's eyeballs. A reporter named Calligari (Fausto Lombardi) of the Fox News variety, jumps to his feet and lambasts the artist Giovanna (Monica Carpanese), accusing her of actually causing the killings by producing such reprehensible entertainment. "If I had my way, I'd burn them all - all this violent subcultural trash!" To which the audience wildly applauds. Dude's probably pen pals with Tipper Gore. To pacify the audience, the publisher, Binelli, accuses them all of a "moral lynching"(!!) which, naturally, causes everyone to relax and line up for autographs. As one would expect.

Just to make things worse for the already frazzled Giovanna, police inspector Callistrati (Antonio Zequila) butts in with his own accusations that the comic is inspiring the killer, to which Giovanna replies in the calm, collected way that you would expect from an Italian, "if the killer used an electric drill, I suppose you'd take it up with Black & Decker!?" This goes on while Binelli hits on his secretary Emy (Emy Valentino), because... you know, Italians. Giovanna decides to go home, ditching her boyfriend/writer along the way, only to get a creepy phone call and finds a pair of torn out eyeballs on her mantle piece!

This leads to a surprisingly convoluted plot in which everyone is a suspect and red herrings run rampant. Surprisingly, because, aside from the opening scene with the graphic eye-gouging, this feels like an old-school giallo with a heavy emphasis on keeping the audience off-balance, constantly second guessing who might be the killer.

Much of the movie bounces around from various locations on land and sea where Giovanna is trying to escape the lurking killer while the police fumble about with almost too many clues. At the autopsy for the first victim, inspector Callistrati rants about how the killer carved out her eyes and stuck a stiletto up her nose "just like the ancient Egyptians!" Wait, so 31BC Nubians were riding around on suped-up donkeys shaking down merchants with their switchblades? Were was Maurizio Merli when you needed him?

At one point Giovanni gets a call quoting her comic "In the mirror I have seen the dark side of my being and while my eyes watched it, it watched me." This is said after showing the killer get dressed in front of a surprisingly elaborate mirror set up in which the outline of the killer (with hat!) is on the mirror and some bleeding eyes are reflected in the wall on the opposite side of the mirror. Clearly the killer doesn't have a day job. We also discover that the killer is... the conservative reporter! This is a swerve that I'm pretty sure is a nod to Argento's TENEBRAE (1982). The reporter is shot by the police, at which point he wildly rolls his eyes, grins manically and says "they are all so beautiful" referring to the comics, before passing out. He manages to recover in an asylum, presumed to be the killer until the killings start again.

There is so much oddball stuff going on in this movie, I can't even begin to catalogue it all. In one bit the murderer finds the secretary Emy at work late and after a struggle manages to make her death look like the most contrived suicide ever, with her corpse slumped backwards over a table, holding a syringe in her own throat and a letter next to her body claiming to be the killer. While the police are doing their forensic duty, Giovanna and her boyfriend (who could also the be the killer) are brought into the middle of the crime scene so that Giovanna can be totally traumatized by the sight of Emy being in a state of dead. After she completely freaks out, the inspector says "You better leave this room. You might smudge prints or destroy other evidence." Why did you bring them in then?! Later the inspector basically recites to the camera the entirety of the events that lead up to Emy's death as if he was reconstructing the crime in his head, at the end of this long, definitely not padding, scene he discovers that Emy wrote the killer's name on a sticky note. We know this is the identity of the killer and not just a random note to draw a co-worker's attention to something innocuous because... Emy has ink on her fingers! Iron-clad proof. At which point the inspector turns to the camera and says "OH. MY. GOD." I swear this is probably the funniest thing I've ever seen and possibly made the movie worth watching all by itself.

The whole thing wraps up with a surprising (I keep using that word), rather nihilistic ending that apparently was partially cut for the Italian release. Although I was not able to get ahold of the Italian version, apparently Mattei decided to not only trim some of the grimness from the ending, but also chose to insert and replace some of the deaths in the movie with bits from A BLADE IN THE DARK (1983). Not that Mattei has never clumsily inserted mismatched footage from other films, not at all, he took the old trick of Cormanizing to a whole new level. I just can't imagine how they would fit in at all. They are extremely different and to be completely honest, what is here is fine for what it is.

Some of those British movie "experts" have gone on record lambasting this movie with their usual, "it's not high-art, therefore rubbish" attitude. I aways enjoy Kim Newman popping up on what seems like every UK special edition saying, in a sneering tone, variations of "It's enjoyable schlock, if you like that sort of thing". This serves two purposes. One, to denigrate the film in question as not being of an acceptable standard for his sophisticated tastes and two, to distance himself from the film implying that there are some subhumans who may enjoy this, but clearly not him. If you find it impossible to see the craft in LET SLEEPING CORPSES LIE (1974), why bother to be interviewed on the SE disc for the film? Troy Howarth upbraided MADNESS on several levels, one criticism being that the acting was "wooden". I honestly wonder if he has seen the film as the acting is clearly playing to the cheap seats. It's Italian actors acting like Italians. Every discussion is a shouting match, every misfortune a calamity. Giovanna's reactions to her predicaments are so wildly over the top and hysterical that it becomes pretty damn funny, but "wooden"? Nah, man. Not even close.

Is MADNESS high art? No. Is it as good as DEEP RED (1975)? Of course not. Does that mean that it is not even worth seeing? Also no. If you can enjoy Italian genre films for both the highs and the lows, there is a lot that they have to offer. This is particularly rewarding if you enjoy getting in the weeds on a particular genre, or a particular director, or both. I still have a few more obscure, what appear to be SOV non-horror, Mattei movies to check off my list, but this is such an odd entry in his career that it is interesting and surprisingly entertaining. If nothing else, it moves along at a fast enough pace and throws enough weird stuff at the wall that it's never boring.